Welcome Anonymous, It is currently Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:34 am
     

NIP vs Flashing

Discuss and interact with contributors and members about Nude In Public.

NIP vs Flashing

Postby Intrepid » Sun Feb 22, 2015 8:10 am

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate any woman that will reveal herself in public, but perhaps there needs to be a separation of categories. A lot of contributions feature women who are raising a shirt, opening up a long coat or lifting the hem of a skirt or dress in public while coyly being turned away from passersby. You can tell, sometimes, by the reaction of people in the background that they suspect something is going on, but they can't possibly see anything. Others pose fully nude in obviously public places with people in the background (my favorite is couples, a man and woman, who are watching. I find interesting the reaction of the female part of the pair...sometimes she watches with as much enjoyment as the man, other times she studiously looks away as the man gapes. You KNOW he is going to catch hell later) who may or may not be watching as well. Some contributors will interact with people they encounter. While I enjoy looking at the flashers, I most admire those with the courage to pose fully nude.

Anyone else have thoughts on this? Again, I am NOT denigrating anyone who contributes any sort of nude photography.
Intrepid
 
Posts: 3281
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:05 pm
Location: U.S.

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby Ina » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:06 am

Good point! Would be great to have different categories.

However, I think it would be even more difficult to assign a contri to the correct category. Already today some contris are questionable whether they are in the correct category.
Ina
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:14 am

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby CharlesConleyV » Thu Mar 05, 2015 2:00 pm

absolutely agree with Ina
Really would be great to have different categories.
CharlesConleyV
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 1:46 pm

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby redback » Tue Jun 30, 2015 3:36 pm

I agree in principle to more categories but if NIP was reserved to full nude inn public there would be few contributors.
As much as I love seeing Bri or Vienna, I could look at them all day, except for a few "one off" contributors They would be about the only 2 contributing in NIP.
Sinsation used to do a few but I haven't seen her for some time unfortunately.

Like Intrepid, I have huge respect for the ladies who go full nude in public and post on here, they are definitely braver than I am.

At the end of the day, thank you to ALL the ladies who post here, whether flashing, NIP, Private or freestyle. You make an old man very happy.
User avatar
redback
 
Posts: 415
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 7:28 pm

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby AnonAnon » Fri Jul 03, 2015 10:49 pm

Public nudity involves a legal risk, which is a completely different thrill that from legally safe exhibitionism.

My wife is most comfortable when she's completely naked and I see that every day when she does yoga naked on our master bedroom deck in the morning. I have a privacy barrier that extends the half-wall up, but the glass doors have solar reflective film that almost certainly allows for views by neighbors, which doesn't disturb her complicated practice one bit. I have no problem with anyone seeing her naked either, and, apart from previous lovers, at least one photographer friend and his assistants have seen her almost as intimately as I have though the images, which displayed in a small gallery, hid most of her face. However, I wouldn't be comfortable with her taking any legal risk and she's never expressed an interest either.
AnonAnon
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 8:37 pm

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby nampac » Wed Jul 15, 2015 4:57 am

http://www.visitrapidcity.com/things-to ... aZJp6RVhBd

Here is a challenge for you exhibitionists.
Rapid City South-Dakota , a pic with each president!
nampac
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:48 pm

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby Intrepid » Thu Aug 06, 2015 4:57 am

It's getting worse. In the past week there are two contris of women sitting in public, fully clothed, spreading their legs for the camera. Whenever there is anyone remotely close, the legs are back together or crossed.
Is this really NIP? Is anyone screening these contributions to see if they are in the right category?

Vienna is about the only one doing true NIP.
But she does it so well....
Intrepid
 
Posts: 3281
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:05 pm
Location: U.S.

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby Merlin52 » Tue Aug 18, 2015 12:09 pm

I think a comment from someone who has actually done it would be in order.
Merlin52
 
Posts: 92
Images: 1
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:29 pm

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby AnonAnon » Tue Nov 03, 2015 10:28 pm

We think the camera causes complications. My wife feels less natural. The other people involved do not want to be in images or do, but aren't the types you want in there. The entire mood of showing, making people comfortable looking and enjoying is destroyed. I've tried taking photos of my wife's outfits at home and it almost never comes out well. Very rarely, friends have captured near-candid images and some of those have been great. My wife has done some very revealing nudes, including some in an alley where she was spray painted over with graffiti along with the wall, but they have always been serious projects with friend studying photography and with some sort of artistic idea.
AnonAnon
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 8:37 pm

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby Merlin52 » Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:58 pm

For most people it takes practice to get comfortable in front of the camera. For the photographer it takes study and practice to learn to manipulate the conditions to get a good photo. One tip though, a long (telephoto) lens puts the camera further away and is less noticeable to everyone. There are also mirror attachments that would allow you to turn the camera 90 degrees away.
Merlin52
 
Posts: 92
Images: 1
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:29 pm

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby AnonAnon » Tue Dec 08, 2015 9:40 pm

Merlin, you're right about the photographer. In the case of the alley graffiti shoot, she had a very clear idea of what she wanted. The paint was applied by a fellow student, but it was a guy and my wife has to wash several times, which she did from buckets of water inside a dilapidated structure beside the alley. The water was cold, her nipples were erect and she had to wash paint out of her butt and pubic area with the two of them telling her when the paint was sufficiently removed, but the photographer, even though only a student, made it all feel professional and organized. My wife emerged elated and excited from the shoot rather than embarrassed.
AnonAnon
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 8:37 pm

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby DarknLadyJedi » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:59 am

One of the big problems with making more categories is less contributions per category.

But also if you say that a person has to be fully nude in public then you will discover that even less people will want to try. While many people may be willing to flash or do quick peeks and then build up to more exciting things, few are willing to just take off their cloths and walk in to a store and risk arrest.

So you end up losing new contributors who are true amateurs in favor of professionals do set work.
DarkJedi & LadyJedi
DarknLadyJedi
 
Posts: 462
Images: 0
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:11 am
Location: Florida

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby Merlin52 » Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:40 am

That has been done before.
Merlin52
 
Posts: 92
Images: 1
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:29 pm

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby jay72 » Tue Jan 10, 2017 10:20 am

It's a good question.

My first contri was, in my opinion, wrongly categorised as "Freestyle". I had pics of my wife fully naked around a local monument, on a country road. In fact she walked 50 yards down this road and back wearing nothing but black high heels, a couple of minutes after she returned to our car, another car appeared around the corner.

Even had a picture of her naked with a van passing about 6 feet behind her.

I think it should be about "risk" element, and not who else is in the photo.

Shirt/skirt lifting in public = low risk.
Topless/naked on a topless/naked beach = low risk
Naked on a road (albeit not very busy) = high risk.

Just my 2c.
jay72
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 4:00 am

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby AnonAnon » Sat Mar 11, 2017 9:36 pm

My wife has never attempted an NIP with significant risk of being spotted by people outside the team of photographers, but she recently allowed a project where she posed as a prostitute of the future with a mask to be hung up at a local lounge, cheekily in the men's single occupancy bathroom and in the corridor right outside it. Her face and jawline are not discernible, but the photographer is local and plenty of our friends have seen her tits and landing strip that if they were paying attention they could make an accurate assumption. The images are interesting in that the customer in the room with the prostitute is a robot.
AnonAnon
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 8:37 pm

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby Merlin52 » Sat Mar 11, 2017 9:59 pm

It has been tried before, but there were not really enough contris to support the NIP section. It takes more nerve, planning and caution. I have shot a number of women in various open places around Southern California without incident, but it does take a brave model to get out there.
Merlin52
 
Posts: 92
Images: 1
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:29 pm

Re: NIP vs Flashing

Postby AnonAnon » Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:54 pm

My wife has a pair of pants she likes to wear without panties to large public shows that are skin-tight and skin-colored. The color provides some visual confusion from the back, but from the front there is nothing hiding her landing strip, which is visible as a darkish shadow even from quite far away. Once the eyes adjust, you're basically looking at a woman naked from the waist down and every blemish on her butt, where the fabric stretches to conform, can be seen. When a photo is being taken, she usually dangles a hand in front of her crotch for modesty though the front is less stretched and at least a little concealing. On occasion, she has played around with friends who have tried to photograph her by not using her hand for cover and the photos have been very revealing indeed.

While we were out on such an evening, I asked her if she thought she would enjoy being naked in public. Not as a model or around a private pool, but somewhere in public where she would today comfortably sport a very see through top or even pants. She gave it some thought and then said that she didn't think she'd be embarrassed, but she felt that it would be more of a dare rather than something sexy that could be enjoyed. She asked me if I would enjoy it and I had to admit that I was enjoying what she had on a lot, but complete nudity would not work.
AnonAnon
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 8:37 pm


Return to Nude In Public

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 130 on Thu May 18, 2017 9:32 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Info

The team
Delete all board cookies
Delete style cookies
• All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
RocketTheme Joomla Templates